PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN FOOD AND DRUG ALLERGY.

A patient-reported outcome is directly reported by the patient without interpretation of the patient's response by anyone else. It refers to the patient's health (symptoms, feelings), quality of life, or functional status associated with health care or treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are defined as the tools or instruments that are used to measure patient-reported outcomes. Health-related quality of life has been the most studied psychosocial PROM in food allergy, using validated questionnaires. In drug allergy, PROMs are useful in capturing patients' experiences of potential allergic reactions, including subjective symptoms like headache, dizziness or fatigue. PROMs can also help differentiate true allergies from side effects or other non-allergic reactions and inform decisions about drug challenges and de-labeling strategies. Ensuring the chosen tool is validated for the specific allergy context is crucial for accurate data collection. Integrating patient-reported experiences alongside traditional methods can lead to more accurate assessments and personalized care.

Omalizumab for the Treatment of Multiple Food Allergies.

BACKGROUND: Food allergies are common and are associated with substantial morbidity; the only approved treatment is oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. METHODS: In this trial, we assessed whether omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, would be effective and safe as monotherapy in patients with multiple food allergies. Persons 1 to 55 years of age who were allergic to peanuts and at least two other trial-specified foods (cashew, milk, egg, walnut, wheat, and hazelnut) were screened. Inclusion required a reaction to a food challenge of 100 mg or less of peanut protein and 300 mg or less of the two other foods. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive omalizumab or placebo administered subcutaneously (with the dose based on weight and IgE levels) every 2 to 4 weeks for 16 to 20 weeks, after which the challenges were repeated. The primary end point was ingestion of peanut protein in a single dose of 600 mg or more without dose-limiting symptoms. The three key secondary end points were the consumption of cashew, of milk, and of egg in single doses of at least 1000 mg each without dose-limiting symptoms. The first 60 participants (59 of whom were children or adolescents) who completed this first stage were enrolled in a 24-week open-label extension. RESULTS: Of the 462 persons who were screened, 180 underwent randomization. The analysis population consisted of the 177 children and adolescents (1 to 17 years of age). A total of 79 of the 118 participants (67%) receiving omalizumab met the primary end-point criteria, as compared with 4 of the 59 participants (7%) receiving placebo (P<0.001). Results for the key secondary end points were consistent with those of the primary end point (cashew, 41% vs. 3%; milk, 66% vs. 10%; egg, 67% vs. 0%; P<0.001 for all comparisons). Safety end points did not differ between the groups, aside from more injection-site reactions in the omalizumab group. CONCLUSIONS: In persons as young as 1 year of age with multiple food allergies, omalizumab treatment for 16 weeks was superior to placebo in increasing the reaction threshold for peanut and other common food allergens. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03881696.).

Impact of socioeconomic factors on allergic diseases.

Allergic and immunologic conditions, including asthma, food allergy, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis, are among the most common chronic conditions in children and adolescents that often last into adulthood. Although rare, inborn errors of immunity are life-altering and potentially fatal if unrecognized or untreated. Thus, allergic and immunologic conditions are both medical and public health issues that are profoundly affected by socioeconomic factors. Recently, studies have highlighted societal issues to evaluate factors at multiple levels that contribute to health inequities and the potential steps toward closing those gaps. Socioeconomic disparities can influence all aspects of care, including health care access and quality, diagnosis, management, education, and disease prevalence and outcomes. Ongoing research, engagement, and deliberate investment of resources by relevant stakeholders and advocacy approaches are needed to identify and address the impact of socioeconomics on health care disparities and outcomes among patients with allergic and immunologic diseases.

New Approaches to Food Allergy Immunotherapy.

Food allergy is an increasing public health problem in children and adults. In addition to the risk of potentially severe reactions, food allergy can have a significant burden on quality of life, nutrition, cost of living, and social activities. Traditionally, treatment has primarily included strict food allergen avoidance and use of emergency medications to treat an allergic reaction. However, in recent years, there have been significant strides in the advancement of food allergy treatment, including the approval of the first and only approved therapy (peanut oral immunotherapy) for food allergy in 2020. Clinical trials have primarily focused on food allergen immunotherapy (oral, epicutaneous, sublingual). Building off of a foundation of promising data supporting the efficacy of food oral immunotherapy and our greater understanding of the underlying mechanism of immunotherapy, newer approaches, including alternative routes of delivery, adjuncts to therapy, modified allergens, and utilization in younger patients, aim to provide safer and more effective treatment approaches to the millions of patients burdened by food allergy.

Rates of New Peanut Allergy and Discontinuation Following Introduction in High-Risk Infants.

BACKGROUND: Peanut introduction guidelines recommend that infants with severe eczema and/or egg allergy consume 6 g of peanut protein weekly to prevent peanut allergy. Rates of new peanut allergy after introduction and adherence remain under study. OBJECTIVE: To determine compliance with peanut introduction guidelines, rates of new peanut allergy, and reasons for discontinuation of peanut consumption in a cohort of high-risk infants. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 4- to 11-month-old high-risk infants (defined as moderate-severe eczema or non-peanut food allergy or a first-degree relative with peanut allergy) with no prior peanut exposure who were determined to not be peanut allergic were recommended to introduce 6 g of peanut protein weekly. Participants were followed to 30 months with 2 in-person visits and monthly questionnaires. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven infants were followed. At last follow-up, 245 (88%) were consuming some peanut protein with median weekly consumption of 3 g (interquartile range: 1-5 g). New peanut allergy developed in 6 (2%), with 2 of those cases consistent with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome. Fear of reaction in another household member was the most common reason for peanut discontinuation. Reactions to peanut after introduction in the index infant occurred in <2% of peanut-allergic siblings and in 20% of peanut-allergic parents. CONCLUSION: We found low rates of new peanut allergy and generally low rates of peanut discontinuation after introduction in our high-risk cohort. However, families of high-risk infants require significant support with introduction, especially those with another peanut-allergic member.

The SunBEAm birth cohort: Protocol design.

Background: Food allergy (FA) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are common conditions that often present in the first year of life. Identification of underlying mechanisms and environmental determinants of FA and AD is essential to develop and implement effective prevention and treatment strategies. Objectives: We sought to describe the design of the Systems Biology of Early Atopy (SunBEAm) birth cohort. Methods: Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and administered through the Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR), SunBEAm is a US population-based, multicenter birth cohort that enrolls pregnant mothers, fathers, and their newborns and follows them to 3 years. Questionnaire and biosampling strategies were developed to apply a systems biology approach to identify environmental, immunologic, and multiomic determinants of AD, FA, and other allergic outcomes. Results: Enrollment is currently underway. On the basis of an estimated FA prevalence of 6%, the enrollment goal is 2500 infants. AD is defined on the basis of questionnaire and assessment, and FA is defined by an algorithm combining history and testing. Although any FA will be recorded, we focus on the diagnosis of egg, milk, and peanut at 5 months, adding wheat, soy, cashew, hazelnut, walnut, codfish, shrimp, and sesame starting at 12 months. Sampling includes blood, hair, stool, dust, water, tape strips, skin swabs, nasal secretions, nasal swabs, saliva, urine, functional aspects of the skin, and maternal breast milk and vaginal swabs. Conclusions: The SunBEAm birth cohort will provide a rich repository of data and specimens to interrogate mechanisms and determinants of early allergic outcomes, with an emphasis on FA, AD, and systems biology.

Identification of cow milk epitopes to characterize and quantify disease-specific T cells in allergic children.

BACKGROUND: Cow milk (CM) allergy is the most prevalent food allergy in young children in the United States and Great Britain. Current diagnostic tests are either unreliable (IgE test and skin prick test) or resource-intensive with risks (food challenges). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether allergen-specific T cells in CM-allergic (CMA) patients have a distinct quality and/or quantity that could potentially be used as a diagnostic marker. METHODS: Using PBMCs from 147 food-allergic pediatric subjects, we mapped T-cell responses to a set of reactive epitopes in CM that we compiled in a peptide pool. This pool induced cytokine responses in in vitro cultured cells distinguishing subjects with CMA from subjects without CMA. We further used the pool to isolate and characterize antigen-specific CD4 memory T cells using flow cytometry and single-cell RNA/TCR sequencing assays. RESULTS: We detected significant changes in the transcriptional program and clonality of CM antigen-specific (CM+) T cells elicited by the pool in subjects with CMA versus subjects without CMA ex vivo. CM+ T cells from subjects with CMA had increased percentages of FOXP3+ cells over FOXP3- cells. FOXP3+ cells are often equated with regulatory T cells that have suppressive activity, but CM+ FOXP3+ cells from subjects with CMA showed significant expression of interferon-responsive genes and dysregulated chemokine receptor expression compared with subjects without CMA, suggesting that these are not conventional regulatory T cells. The CM+ FOXP3+ cells were also more clonally expanded than the FOXP3- population. We were further able to use surface markers (CD25, CD127, and CCR7) in combination with our peptide pool stimulation to quantify these CM+ FOXP3+ cells by a simple flow-cytometry assay. We show increased percentages of CM+ CD127-CD25+ cells from subjects with CMA in an independent cohort, which could be used for diagnostic purposes. Looking specifically for TH2 cells normally associated with allergic diseases, we found a small population of clonally expanded CM+ cells that were significantly increased in subjects with CMA and that had high expression of TH2 cytokines and pathogenic TH2/T follicular helper markers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings suggest that there are several differences in the phenotypes of CM+ T cells with CM allergy and that the increase in CM+ FOXP3+ cells is a potential diagnostic marker of an allergic state. Such markers have promising applications in monitoring natural disease outgrowth and/or the efficacy of immunotherapy that will need to be validated in future studies.

Anti-immunoglobulin E for food allergy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the safety and efficacy of anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monotherapy or as an adjunct to oral immunotherapy (OIT) in the treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were performed using the Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medline, Scopus, and PubMed Central to identify articles in English related to food allergy and anti-IgE therapies, including omalizumab and ligelizemab. STUDY SELECTIONS: Original research articles reviewed include interventional studies, retrospective and prospective observational studies, peer-reviewed reviews, and systematic reviews. Data were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Here, we discuss the current anti-IgE therapies being studied as a potential treatment option for food allergy. We also review trial design, safety, and efficacy data on the use of anti-IgE therapies as monotherapy or in combination with OIT for food allergies. Finally, we discuss clinical trials in progress using omalizumab and ligelizumab and highlight important clinical considerations. CONCLUSION: Over the past 20 years, substantial progress has been made in understanding the potential role of anti-IgE therapies for food allergy. Anti-IgE therapies seem to be a promising option that may increase reaction dose thresholds and decrease time to reach OIT maintenance and OIT dosing-related reactions. Two phase 3 trials are currently in progress studying anti-IgE potential monotherapy for the treatment of peanut and multifood allergies. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these emerging treatment options.

Home Introduction of Baked Egg After Oral Food Challenge.

BACKGROUND: Baked egg (BE) introduction may accelerate resolution of egg allergy. Long-term data regarding the safety and success of BE introduction in the real world are limited. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of future egg consumption and barriers to advancement based on characteristics during and after BE oral food challenges (OFCs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive BE OFCs with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Goal doses ranged from 1/16 to 1/4 egg. Outcomes were categorized as pass (no reaction), fail (but allowed BE introduction), or fail (avoid). Status of egg introduction and reactions were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were included; 134 passed and 109 failed (70 of whom were instructed to introduce BE). At follow-up (median, 47 months), 90 (37%) were consuming direct egg, 26 (11%) lightly cooked egg, 39 (16%) BE, and 88 (36%) avoiding; 58% who failed versus 81% who passed were consuming some form of egg. Median egg white IgE level was significantly higher among avoiders versus introducers (8.7 vs 5.8; P = .008). Lower egg white IgE level and younger age were predictors of egg consumption in some form at follow-up (median IgE, 5.8 vs 8.4; P = .03; median age, 4.0 vs 8.0 years; P < .001). A total of 94 patients had a total of 136 reactions (132 mild, 4 severe); 22 (16.2%) were accidental exposures, 42 (30.9%) planned escalations, and 72 (52.9%) with previously tolerated doses. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who underwent a BE OFC continued to consume some form of egg, often advancing to direct egg. However, many reverted to avoidance and adverse reactions were common.

Treatment for food allergy: Current status and unmet needs.

The treatment of food allergy has traditionally relied on avoidance of the offending food(s) and use of emergency medications in the event of accidental exposures. However, this long-standing paradigm is beginning to shift, as a variety of treatment approaches have been and are being developed. This report provides an overview of the past, present, and future landscape of interventional clinical trials for the treatment of food allergy. It focuses on specific issues related to participant characteristics, protocol design, and study end points in the key clinical trials in the literature and examine how differences between studies may impact the clinical significance of the study results. Recommendations are provided for the optimization of future trial designs and focus on specific unmet needs in this rapidly evolving field.

Efficacy and safety of baked milk oral immunotherapy in children with severe milk allergy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Cow's milk allergy is the most common food allergy in young children and has no current treatment. Oral immunotherapy studies to date have shown efficacy but high rates of adverse reactions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of baked milk oral immunotherapy (BMOIT) in children allergic to baked milk. METHODS: Participants (3-18 years) were randomized to receive BMOIT or placebo for 12 months. Efficacy was assessed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge after 12 months of treatment. Safety, quality of life, and mechanistic parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven of 15 (73%) BMOIT participants reached the primary end point, tolerating 4044 mg of baked milk protein after 12 months of oral immunotherapy, compared with 0 of 15 (0%) on placebo. The median maximum tolerated dose and median change from baseline was significantly higher in the BMOIT group than in the placebo group (median maximum tolerated dose, 4044 mg vs 144 mg; P = .001; median change in maximum tolerated dose of 3900 mg vs 0 mg, P = .0001). Dose-related reactions were common, but more than 95% in both groups were mild. There was no significant change in cow's milk- or beta lactoglobulin-IgE from baseline for either group. Cow's milk-sIgG4 did significantly increase and casein IgE decreased in the BMOIT group. For proxy-reported food allergy quality of life, there was a significant difference in the emotional impact domain only, with more improving while on placebo compared with BMOIT. Most children and adolescents in the BMOIT group directly reported improvement in at least 1 domain. CONCLUSIONS: BMOIT was well tolerated and induced a substantial level of desensitization after 12 months of treatment.

Update on omalizumab in allergen immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most relevant studies in the advancing field of omalizumab in allergen immunotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Omalizumab has been used in combination with inhalant, venom, and food allergen immunotherapy. These studies suggest that omalizumab can decrease the time required to reach maintenance dosing and adverse events. However, severe adverse events do still occur. Limited long-term data suggests that there is a risk for increased reactivity after stopping omalizumab. SUMMARY: Omalizumab in conjunction with immunotherapy has shown promising results for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, venom hypersensitivity, and food allergy, especially in the reduction of adverse events. Larger randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to better understand optimal dosing and duration, cost--benefit analysis, ideal patients, and long-term benefits. This combination therapy has the potential to improve treatment, particularly for high-risk patients.

Omalizumab as an adjuvant in food allergen immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most relevant studies in the rapidly advancing field of omalizumab as an adjunct to food allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT). RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical trials have primarily focused on milk, peanut, and multiallergen OIT combined with omalizumab. These studies suggest that omalizumab in addition to OIT can decrease the time required to reach maintenance OIT dosing and adverse events; however, serious adverse events did still occur. There is limited long-term data but available information suggests that individuals are at risk for increased reactivity after stopping omalizumab, and many discontinued treatment. There has been diversity in study designs, dosing, and populations. SUMMARY: The use of anti-IgE antibody as an adjunct to food allergen OIT has been an expanding area of research with several additional trials underway. Significant progress has been made in the past decades but further studies are needed to optimize protocols, improve safety and efficacy, and identify patients who will have the greatest benefit.

Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Food Allergy.

The diagnosis of food allergy can have a major impact on the lives of patients and families, imposing dietary restrictions and limitations on social activities. On the other hand, misdiagnosis can place the patient at risk of a potentially severe allergic reaction. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis of food allergy is of utmost importance. The diagnosis of food allergy is often established by the combination of the clinical history and allergen-specific IgE; however, without a clear history of an allergic reaction, the interpretation of IgE sensitization tests can be difficult. There are also rare cases of clinical food allergy in the absence of IgE sensitization. For that reason, testing for suspected food allergy ideally requires access to oral food challenges (OFCs), which are currently the gold standard tests to diagnose food allergy. As OFCs are time consuming and involve the risk of acute allergic reactions of unpredictable severity, the question remains: how can we improve the accuracy of diagnosis before referring the patient for an OFC? Herein, we review the predictive value of different tests used to support the diagnosis of food allergy, discuss implications for therapy and prognosis, and propose a diagnostic approach to be applied in clinical practice.

Ara h 2-specific IgE is superior to whole peanut extract-based serology or skin prick test for diagnosis of peanut allergy in infancy.

BACKGROUND: Screening of high-risk infants for peanut allergy (PA) before introduction is now recommended in the United States, but the optimal approach is not clear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of peanut skin prick test (SPT), peanut-specific IgE (sIgE), and sIgE to peanut components in a screening population of infants before known peanut exposure. METHODS: Infants aged 4 to 11 months with (1) no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and (2) (a) moderate-severe eczema, (b) history of food allergy, and/or (c) first-degree relative with a history of PA received peanut SPT, peanut-sIgE and component-IgE testing, and, depending on SPT wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding. Receiver-operator characteristic areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared, and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males), and 37 (11%) were found to have PA. Overall, Ara h 2-sIgE at a cutoff point of 0.1 kUa/L discriminated between allergic and nonallergic best (AUC, 0.96; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 98%), compared with peanut-sIgE at 0.1 kUa/L (AUC, 0.89; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 78%) or 0.35 kUa/L (AUC, 0.91; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 86%), or SPT at wheal size 3 mm (AUC, 0.90; sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 88%) or 8 mm (AUC, 0.87; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 99%). Ara h 1-sIgE and Ara h 3-sIgE did not add to prediction of PA when included in a model with Ara h 2-sIgE, and Ara h 8-sIgE discriminated poorly (AUC, 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of only Ara h 2-sIgE should be considered if screening of high-risk infants is performed before peanut introduction.

Age and eczema severity, but not family history, are major risk factors for peanut allergy in infancy.

BACKGROUND: Whether to screen high-risk groups before early peanut introduction is controversial. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the risk of peanut allergy (PA) before peanut introduction for infants with (1) moderate-severe eczema, (2) another food allergy (FA), and/or (3) a first-degree relative with peanut allergy (FH). METHODS: Infants aged 4 to 11 months with no history of peanut ingestion, testing, or reaction and at least 1 of the above risk factors received peanut skin prick test and, depending on skin prick test wheal size, oral food challenge or observed feeding. RESULTS: A total of 321 subjects completed the enrollment visit (median age, 7.2 months; 58% males); 78 had eczema only, 11 FA only, 107 FH only, and 125 had multiple risk factors. Overall, 18% of 195 with eczema, 19% of 59 with FA, and 4% of 201 with FH had PA. Only 1% of 115 with FH and no eczema had PA. Among those with eczema, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68 per month), higher SCORing Atopic Dermatitis score (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34 per 5 points), black (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.92-17.4 compared with white), or Asian race (OR, 6.98; 95% CI, 1.92-25.44) and suspected or diagnosed other FA (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.62-9.80) were associated with PA. CONCLUSIONS: PA is common in infants with moderate-severe eczema, whereas FH without eczema is not a major risk factor, suggesting screening only in those with significant eczema. Even within the first year of life, introduction at later ages is associated with a higher risk of PA among those with eczema, supporting introduction of peanut as early as possible.